Yana Welinder, 16/10/2014 02:52:
Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia sites are
We call them Wikimedia projects. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_projects
At the beginning I'd rather place something more general and definite, à la «Wikimedia projects have Open Access as a prerequisite for an environment in which they can flourish. Acknowledging this, Wikimedia has been part of the Open Access movement since 2009 or earlier, raising public awareness and intensifying cooperation with others in the OA movement» (OA experts? OA professionals? other OA promoters?). And the link for this paragraph will be https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Open_access
The content is enriched by citations to open access scholarship [...] write Wikipedia articles and enrich them with citations.
Duplicate. Should also use a term more generic than "citations": Wikimedia Commons, Wikisource and Wikidata have material from Open Access sources. Wikibooks and Wikiversity too, probably, or could. Etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sourcesCitations are particularly important to allow readers to verify Wikipedia articles and learn more about the topic from the underlying sources. Given the importance of open access to Wikipedia, the Wikimedia community of contributors has set up https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/01/15/wikimedia-and-open-access/a WikiProject Open Access https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Open_Accessto improve open access-related articles on Wikipedia and create an Open Access Policy https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Committee/Areas_of_interest/Open-access_policyfor research projects with the support https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Committee/Areas_of_interest/Significant_supportof the Wikimedia Foundation.
See comments by Daniel for the specifics.
Should we also mention any Open Access week event being organised by Wikimedia across the world?
Nemo