On 9 February 2015 at 22:59, Aaron Halfaker ahalfaker@wikimedia.org wrote:
Our spot checking suggests that 98% of these DOIs resolve. The remaining 2% were extracted correctly, but they appear to be typos.
All on en.Wikipedia?
Do DoIs not incude check digits? We should test for tehse in citation templates. Does your data show which templates (if any) the broken DoIs were in?