Hi,
Refusing to review for a closed-access journal is something many
subscribers of this list have already done, I suspect.
We made a pledge to help you publicize that stance and encourage others
to adopt it:
https://nofreeviewnoreview.org/
It is intended to complement other boycott pledges, without targeting a
specific publisher or academic field. We hope you find it useful!
Cheers,
Antonin
For the upcoming #1lib1ref period, I've refreshed the queue of suggested
edits in <https://tools.wmflabs.org/oabot/>, to suggest edits from the
most popular articles for which we found some OA link (~500 for now).
Hopefully this makes the tool more engaging for new users. Given the
statistics on citation engagement recently published by Piccardi, Redi
et al at <https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08614>, some of the obscure
articles we previously propose may not get a click on any citation for
years. It's a bit lame to propose such edits, while spending a few
minutes of work to add a link which can produce a few dozens
interactions with OA repositories ought to be interesting.
The list of articles by their popularity is at
<http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3783468>. Maybe it can be useful also for
other projects.
It's just a simple extraction from the pageviews API, but may save you
some time if you're not used to command line scripts or your network
latency is too high. Not to mention that querying 20k articles on
TreeViews is prone to crashes.
Federico