Hello everyone,
I am sending this to gauge interest in attending Kubernetes training
sessions. We currently are mostly focused in courses like
https://training.linuxfoundation.org/training/kubernetes-fundamentals-lfs25….
The exact details (online vs instructor led, with or without an exam at the
end) are still being worked on.
If you are interested, please do reply to me. Let me repeat, that this is
to gauge interest, it's not binding for you.
--
Alexandros Kosiaris
Principal Site Reliability Engineer
Wikimedia Foundation
What is the general thought process of the group around using upstream
helm charts?
In my effort to stand up Jaeger I have been using the upstream charts to
test locally in Minikube. Thus far they seem to work pretty well, my
current work in progress may be found here,
https://gitlab.wikimedia.org/repos/sre/jaeger-minikube.
Giuseppe mentioned concerns with the quality of upstream charts. How
does one assess the quality, other than through use?
Hello everyone,
Per one of my action items from our last meeting, I 've created the
following:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Kubernetes_SIG
I consider it a draft, but good enough that I decided to be bold the wiki
way and just publish it. In the same spirit, feel free to amend. Meetings
notes from our last 2 meetings have been published as well and are included
at the end of the page.
Furthermore, the topic for our next meeting (having 4 votes) is going to be:
- Persistent Storage for workloads in our clusters
Runner ups, with 3 votes each (and candidates for our next discussions)
are:
-
Expected Kubernetes usage/roadmap/vision/plan per team
-
Kubernetes versioning discussion
I 've started drafting an agenda in
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18-dlIEOJjWqOXQ7doW7izYoa7-gLDAkQCVwQJwf…
, feel free to contribute.
--
Alexandros Kosiaris
Principal Site Reliability Engineer
Wikimedia Foundation