So great there is a case study being built! Some minor points (that may not be so minor to laypersons...) that I think I brought up before on a thread with Walters and Wikimedia peeps around marking: * The bottom (CC) at the Walters website links to cc by-nc-sa -- which is not the license mentioned in the text (by-sa). Also tricky what is meant by putting (cc) instead of a (c) notice + license notice. * An example image lists "creative commons license" generically, rather than specifically naming the CC BY-SA license and linking to it --which is a marking best practice, eg. http://art.thewalters.org/detail/175/napoleon-i/ None of this is to detract from the great contribution by Walters and work done by Wikimedia volunteers to make this happen, but would be great to continue working on improving marking, esp. if this will be held up as an example for case study! Fyi, we are working on release revamped best practices around marking for V4.0 CC license launch, so stay tuned for simpler pages at http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Marking. Cheers, Jane On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Sarah Stierch &lt;sarah.stierch(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote;wrote: -- Jane Park Project Manager <http://creativecommons.org/staff#janepark> Creative Commons School of Open, a collaboration with P2PU: http://schoolofopen.org