Concerning platform for interactions I strongly agree with David, in great
part because of the nature of Wikimedia projects. Our conversations are
not just for ourselves but lay the groundwork for those people who will
want to see what and how we've tried to plan things. In that sense,
preserving the record on a Wikimedia wiki (Wikipedia or elsewhere) is
really essential.
As far as social media, I agree again with David that the number of tools
we have available threatens to diffuse the focus of what we're trying to
accomplish. A tool is only a tool; it should not be our main focus, and
due to the variety of people involved, we should select something that
everyone is comfortable with.
--
Bob Kosovsky, Ph.D. -- Curator, Rare Books and Manuscripts,
Music Division, The New York Public Library for the Performing Arts
blog:
http://www.nypl.org/blog/author/44 Twitter: @kos2
Listowner: OPERA-L ; SMT-TALK ; SMT-ANNOUNCE ; SoundForge-users
- My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my institutions -
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:03 AM, David Goodman
dggenwp@gmail.com wrote:
> I also agree with Sarah about IRC. However, I also suggest that
> organizing a separate wiki would be counterproductive. There are
> already too many places for this and similar wikipedia-associated
> projects, and I think the appropriate direction is to condense and
> concentrate them. Internal is necessary only for things that
> inherently cannot be public, and meta only for things which
> fundamentally concern cross-wiki matters such as mediawiki platform
> development -- other things posted there are normally lost to most of
> the enWP community. Similarly for the now-deceased strategy wiki, and
> any other accessory projects. .
>
> As this is a US project, working I think almost entirely in English,
> appropriate project pages on the enWP is the obvious location. Anyone
> outside the WP community could as easily learn to use this as any
> separate wiki.
>
> As for other social media, we may need them for outreach, but they do
> simply constitute additional places to divide our efforts. I'm aware I
> may be old-fashioned in this, and just stubbornly fixed on staying
> with mailing lists, the medium I have predominantly used since they
> were developed. I did adjust to wikis though, and our projects are so
> entwined with WP that it is the natural place.
>
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Paula Kate Marmor
pkm@pobox.com wrote:
> > I work in technology, i have done online community work since 1991, and I
> > heartily loathe IRC, for all the reasons Sarah mentions. Hear, hear.
> >
> > Paula
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, September 6, 2012, Sarah Stierch wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Lori! See my responses inline, as well.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> IRC
> >> An open chat platform used often by Wikipedians, but unfamiliar among
> most
> >> GLAM professionals. Arguments can be made for and against; so discuss
> away.
> >>
> >>
> >> IRC is terrible, archaic, and uncomfortable for the majority of people.
> >> This is 2012, not 1992. People are welcome to have an IRC GLAM US
> channel
> >> but I bet, the majority of the people using it are the same old people
> who
> >> use IRC now. I think we should scrap any focus on IRC and communicate
> >> through social media, wiki, and mailing lists. I figure, if people
> want to
> >> have me involved in something or have a question for me, they will send
> me
> >> an email, wiki me, or Tweet me - and not sit around and wait for me on
> IRC.
> >>
> >> We could always have an IRC office hours for GLAMWIKI but, again, that'd
> >> be just a strict ubergeek thing and that's not inclusive of the broader
> GLAM
> >> community (and those of us Wikipedians who hate IRC because we stopped
> using
> >> it when BBSes disappeared).
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sarah Stierch
> >> Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow
> >> >>Mind the gap! Support Wikipedia women's outreach: donate today<<
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GLAM-US mailing list
> > GLAM-US@lists.wikimedia.org
> >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us
> >
>
>
>
> --
> David Goodman
>
> DGG at the enWP
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DGG
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
>
> _______________________________________________
> GLAM-US mailing list
> GLAM-US@lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us
>