Well, before I could add my comments, the discussion was archived with "*The result of the discussion was:* *speedy keep* as being preliminarily nominated (see PKM's comment). No prejudice against renominating in several months if the categories remain empty."
Yours, Peaceray
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Paula Kate Marmor pkm@pobox.com wrote:
I set up the categories for the new Newcomb Archives and Vorhoff Library GLAM assessment table, and they've been nominated for deletion. Can people please jump in and explain why we create these and they are unpopulated at first?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_D... ?
Paula
GLAM-US mailing list GLAM-US@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam-us