“[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls of classic Pompei. Likewise view patterns can tell future historians a lot about what was hot and what wasn’t in our times. Reason why these raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post https://web.archive.org/web/20171018194720/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson/ almost ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he gave us. Erik retired http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm this past Friday, leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work with him for several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
His Wikistats project https://stats.wikimedia.org/—with his signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid 2000s https://web.archive.org/web/20060412043240/https://stats.wikimedia.org/—has been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history, driven by curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the communities that most needed it.
Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data describing the growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand some of the growing pains and editor retention issues https://web.archive.org/web/20110608214507/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/12/new-editors-are-joining-english-wikipedia-in-droves/ the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by nearly a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current events like elections https://web.archive.org/web/20160405055621/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2008/09/sarah-palin/ or public health crises https://web.archive.org/web/20090708011216/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/05/h1n1-flu-or-new-flu-or/. He has created countless https://twitter.com/Infodisiac/status/1039244151953543169 visualizations https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/10/27/new-interactive-visualization-wikipedia/ that show the enormous gaps in local language content and representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of pie charts https://web.archive.org/web/20141222073751/http://infodisiac.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/piechartscorrected.png, which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited over 1,000 times https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=stats.wikimedia.org in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators in the same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would be one of the most influential authors in the field, and I don't think it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth and growth of the academic field of Wikimedia research, and more broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement, read his statement http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm to learn what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/ Wired published a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's Massive Data Trove".
Dario
Thanks for your work, Erik. I hope that we will see you in the future.
This is the first time that I can recall hearing about a person retiring from WMF. Volunteer retirements and semi-retirements happen regularly, and the reasons that I hear for those retirements are often sad. It's nice to hear of someone who is retiring after years of success and is moving in a positive direction.
I think that you leave a good legacy in the Wikiverse, and as you might guess from my username, I like what you chose for your next project.
Best wishes,
I have always enjoyed Erik's insightful input - especially the insights that people don't like to hear at first. I trust that much more of that is to come in the future, so I'm not ready to say farewells :). I wouldn't be able to accurately summarize it anyway.
Erik, I hope that you'll find a lot of joy in the beautiful tree project that you're working on these days (folks, definitely check it out if you're interested in Leiden's horticulture). It is another beautiful example of how you manage to visualize the things that sound dull without you explaining them. Your presentations at Wikimania were for that reason usually the ones I most looked forward to.
What maybe not everyone realizes, is that Erik is one of the people that the French Wikipedia would categorize as 'Grand Ancients https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Wikip%C3%A9dia:Grands_Anciens', having been active since 2001. A unique understanding of the history of Wikipedia combined with dedication and understanding data has clearly resulted in good work. Thanks for summarizing this so elaborately, Dario :)
Until soon,
Lodewijk
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:54 PM Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your work, Erik. I hope that we will see you in the future.
This is the first time that I can recall hearing about a person retiring from WMF. Volunteer retirements and semi-retirements happen regularly, and the reasons that I hear for those retirements are often sad. It's nice to hear of someone who is retiring after years of success and is moving in a positive direction.
I think that you leave a good legacy in the Wikiverse, and as you might guess from my username, I like what you chose for your next project.
Best wishes,
Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Erik:
From the early days until now, your quiet leadership and excellence have been a great credit to the organization and most importantly, your leadership by example has been an inspiration to untold numbers of people. But, actually, it’s not untold numbers because of your work! You tell it with numbers.
All the best in your next chapter. Thank you so much for your work!
BradPatrick
bap@baplegal.com Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 6, 2019, at 5:21 PM, effe iets anders effeietsanders@gmail.com wrote:
I have always enjoyed Erik's insightful input - especially the insights that people don't like to hear at first. I trust that much more of that is to come in the future, so I'm not ready to say farewells :). I wouldn't be able to accurately summarize it anyway.
Erik, I hope that you'll find a lot of joy in the beautiful tree project that you're working on these days (folks, definitely check it out if you're interested in Leiden's horticulture). It is another beautiful example of how you manage to visualize the things that sound dull without you explaining them. Your presentations at Wikimania were for that reason usually the ones I most looked forward to.
What maybe not everyone realizes, is that Erik is one of the people that the French Wikipedia would categorize as 'Grand Ancients https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Wikip%C3%A9dia:Grands_Anciens', having been active since 2001. A unique understanding of the history of Wikipedia combined with dedication and understanding data has clearly resulted in good work. Thanks for summarizing this so elaborately, Dario :)
Until soon,
Lodewijk
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:54 PM Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your work, Erik. I hope that we will see you in the future.
This is the first time that I can recall hearing about a person retiring from WMF. Volunteer retirements and semi-retirements happen regularly, and the reasons that I hear for those retirements are often sad. It's nice to hear of someone who is retiring after years of success and is moving in a positive direction.
I think that you leave a good legacy in the Wikiverse, and as you might guess from my username, I like what you chose for your next project.
Best wishes,
Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Hi Erik,
Thank you for your work!
When I first came across Wikistats, it completely blew my mind. Such a huge collection of raw data turned into digestible information. It's amazing, stunning, and above all: enlightening. I've spent countless hours digging through Wikistats in awe.
But besides the gargantuan effort that Wikistats represents, I even more value your passion for the data and information it holds, your second-to-none expertise on it, and your willingness to go through the details and numbers with each and everyone, regardless where they come from, your openness, your unbiased-ness, your constructive approach, and your never-shying-away from discussions about the numbers and trends.
Enjoy your retirement from WMF, and seeing your blog post and your tree mapping project, I'm sure it'll be an amazing "Unruhestand" :-)
Have fun, Christian
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:17:48PM -0800, Dario Taraborelli wrote:
“[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls of classic Pompei. Likewise view patterns can tell future historians a lot about what was hot and what wasn’t in our times. Reason why these raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post https://web.archive.org/web/20171018194720/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson/ almost ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he gave us. Erik retired http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm this past Friday, leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work with him for several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
His Wikistats project https://stats.wikimedia.org/—with his signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid 2000s https://web.archive.org/web/20060412043240/https://stats.wikimedia.org/—has been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history, driven by curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the communities that most needed it.
Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data describing the growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand some of the growing pains and editor retention issues https://web.archive.org/web/20110608214507/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/12/new-editors-are-joining-english-wikipedia-in-droves/ the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by nearly a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current events like elections https://web.archive.org/web/20160405055621/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2008/09/sarah-palin/ or public health crises https://web.archive.org/web/20090708011216/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/05/h1n1-flu-or-new-flu-or/. He has created countless https://twitter.com/Infodisiac/status/1039244151953543169 visualizations https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/10/27/new-interactive-visualization-wikipedia/ that show the enormous gaps in local language content and representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of pie charts https://web.archive.org/web/20141222073751/http://infodisiac.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/piechartscorrected.png, which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited over 1,000 times https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=stats.wikimedia.org in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators in the same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would be one of the most influential authors in the field, and I don't think it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth and growth of the academic field of Wikimedia research, and more broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement, read his statement http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm to learn what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/ Wired published a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's Massive Data Trove".
Dario
-- *Dario Taraborelli *Director, Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation research.wikimedia.org • nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Erik,
It's been an incredible honor to work with you as a colleague and a volunteer. Thank you for the stats and all the conversations about categories, topics, languages, ..., but even more so for showing me the path and the purpose, time after time. I will dearly miss you in Wikimedia Foundation, and I hope that I can be a steward of what you stood for (or at least I can say that I will continue to try:).
Enjoy your new endeavors and see you around.
Regards, Leila
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:22 PM Christian Aistleitner christian@quelltextlich.at wrote:
Hi Erik,
Thank you for your work!
When I first came across Wikistats, it completely blew my mind. Such a huge collection of raw data turned into digestible information. It's amazing, stunning, and above all: enlightening. I've spent countless hours digging through Wikistats in awe.
But besides the gargantuan effort that Wikistats represents, I even more value your passion for the data and information it holds, your second-to-none expertise on it, and your willingness to go through the details and numbers with each and everyone, regardless where they come from, your openness, your unbiased-ness, your constructive approach, and your never-shying-away from discussions about the numbers and trends.
Enjoy your retirement from WMF, and seeing your blog post and your tree mapping project, I'm sure it'll be an amazing "Unruhestand" :-)
Have fun, Christian
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:17:48PM -0800, Dario Taraborelli wrote:
“[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls of classic Pompei. Likewise view patterns can tell future historians a lot about what was hot and what wasn’t in our times. Reason why these raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post https://web.archive.org/web/20171018194720/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson/ almost ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he gave us. Erik retired http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm this past Friday, leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work with him for several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
His Wikistats project https://stats.wikimedia.org/—with his signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid 2000s https://web.archive.org/web/20060412043240/https://stats.wikimedia.org/—has been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history, driven by curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the communities that most needed it.
Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data describing the growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand some of the growing pains and editor retention issues https://web.archive.org/web/20110608214507/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/12/new-editors-are-joining-english-wikipedia-in-droves/ the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by nearly a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current events like elections https://web.archive.org/web/20160405055621/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2008/09/sarah-palin/ or public health crises https://web.archive.org/web/20090708011216/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/05/h1n1-flu-or-new-flu-or/. He has created countless https://twitter.com/Infodisiac/status/1039244151953543169 visualizations https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/10/27/new-interactive-visualization-wikipedia/ that show the enormous gaps in local language content and representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of pie charts https://web.archive.org/web/20141222073751/http://infodisiac.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/piechartscorrected.png, which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited over 1,000 times https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=stats.wikimedia.org in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators in the same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would be one of the most influential authors in the field, and I don't think it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth and growth of the academic field of Wikimedia research, and more broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement, read his statement http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm to learn what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/ Wired published a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's Massive Data Trove".
Dario
-- *Dario Taraborelli *Director, Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation research.wikimedia.org • nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- ---- quelltextlich e.U. ---- \ ---- Christian Aistleitner ---- Companies' registry: 360296y in Linz Christian Aistleitner Kefermarkterstrasze 6a/3 Email: christian@quelltextlich.at 4293 Gutau, Austria Phone: +43 7946 / 20 5 81 Fax: +43 7946 / 20 5 81 Homepage: http://quelltextlich.at/
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Hi Erik,
When I saw the Wikistats the very first time in mid 2000 (?) I was very impressed. After meeting with Erik, I respected the project and him even more. The impact of the Wikistats to researchers and students around the world, but also to the open data movement in general, has been incredible. I hope the future historians will notice this.
Thanks Erik. Your new project looks very interesting.
- Teemu
--------------------------------------- Prof. Teemu Leinonen http://www.teemuleinonen.fi + 358 50 351 6796
On 6 Feb 2019, at 23.17, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.orgmailto:dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
“[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls of classic Pompei. Likewise view patterns can tell future historians a lot about what was hot and what wasn’t in our times. Reason why these raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post https://web.archive.org/web/20171018194720/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson/ almost ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he gave us. Erik retired http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm this past Friday, leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work with him for several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
His Wikistats project https://stats.wikimedia.org/—with his signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid 2000s https://web.archive.org/web/20060412043240/https://stats.wikimedia.org/—has been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history, driven by curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the communities that most needed it.
Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data describing the growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand some of the growing pains and editor retention issues https://web.archive.org/web/20110608214507/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/12/new-editors-are-joining-english-wikipedia-in-droves/ the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by nearly a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current events like elections https://web.archive.org/web/20160405055621/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2008/09/sarah-palin/ or public health crises https://web.archive.org/web/20090708011216/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/05/h1n1-flu-or-new-flu-or/. He has created countless https://twitter.com/Infodisiac/status/1039244151953543169 visualizations https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/10/27/new-interactive-visualization-wikipedia/ that show the enormous gaps in local language content and representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of pie charts https://web.archive.org/web/20141222073751/http://infodisiac.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/piechartscorrected.png, which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited over 1,000 times https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=stats.wikimedia.org in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators in the same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would be one of the most influential authors in the field, and I don't think it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth and growth of the academic field of Wikimedia research, and more broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement, read his statement http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm to learn what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/ Wired published a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's Massive Data Trove".
Dario
-- *Dario Taraborelli *Director, Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation research.wikimedia.orghttp://research.wikimedia.org • nitens.orghttp://nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Like so many others, I was blown away by wikistats. I can’t begin to count the number of times I turned to it in my years at the WMF. And it goes without saying that Erik was an exemplary colleague, and a true gentleman. Enjoy your well earned retirement.
Philippe
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:27 PM Leinonen Teemu teemu.leinonen@aalto.fi wrote:
Hi Erik,
When I saw the Wikistats the very first time in mid 2000 (?) I was very impressed. After meeting with Erik, I respected the project and him even more. The impact of the Wikistats to researchers and students around the world, but also to the open data movement in general, has been incredible. I hope the future historians will notice this.
Thanks Erik. Your new project looks very interesting.
- Teemu
Prof. Teemu Leinonen http://www.teemuleinonen.fi
- 358 50 351 6796
On 6 Feb 2019, at 23.17, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org mailto:dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
“[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls of classic Pompei. Likewise view patterns can tell future historians a lot about what was hot and what wasn’t in our times. Reason why these raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post < https://web.archive.org/web/20171018194720/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/0...
almost ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he gave us. Erik retired http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm this past Friday, leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work with him for several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
His Wikistats project https://stats.wikimedia.org/—with his signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid 2000s <https://web.archive.org/web/20060412043240/https://stats.wikimedia.org/
—has
been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history, driven by curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the communities that most needed it.
Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data describing the growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand some of the growing pains and editor retention issues < https://web.archive.org/web/20110608214507/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/1...
the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by nearly a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current events like elections < https://web.archive.org/web/20160405055621/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2008/0...
or public health crises < https://web.archive.org/web/20090708011216/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/0...
.
He has created countless https://twitter.com/Infodisiac/status/1039244151953543169 visualizations < https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/10/27/new-interactive-visualization-wikipedi...
that show the enormous gaps in local language content and representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of pie charts < https://web.archive.org/web/20141222073751/http://infodisiac.com/blog/wp-con...
,
which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited over 1,000 times < https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=stats.wikime...
in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators in the same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would be one of the most influential authors in the field, and I don't think it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth and growth of the academic field of Wikimedia research, and more broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement, read his statement http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm to learn what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/ Wired published a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's Massive Data Trove".
Dario
-- *Dario Taraborelli *Director, Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation research.wikimedia.orghttp://research.wikimedia.org • nitens.org< http://nitens.org%3E • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
So true, Dario! Erik’s contributions have had a massive influence on our understanding of Wikipedia and open content and it was really visionary for him to offer this data from the early days. I have found the data personally invaluable for my own work and hugely grateful to Erik for his service.
All the best for your new chapter, Erik.
Best, Heather
On 7 Feb 2019, at 4:27 pm, Leinonen Teemu teemu.leinonen@aalto.fi wrote:
Hi Erik,
When I saw the Wikistats the very first time in mid 2000 (?) I was very impressed. After meeting with Erik, I respected the project and him even more. The impact of the Wikistats to researchers and students around the world, but also to the open data movement in general, has been incredible. I hope the future historians will notice this.
Thanks Erik. Your new project looks very interesting.
- Teemu
Prof. Teemu Leinonen http://www.teemuleinonen.fi
- 358 50 351 6796
On 6 Feb 2019, at 23.17, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.orgmailto:dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
“[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls of classic Pompei. Likewise view patterns can tell future historians a lot about what was hot and what wasn’t in our times. Reason why these raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post https://web.archive.org/web/20171018194720/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/michael-jackson/ almost ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he gave us. Erik retired http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm this past Friday, leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work with him for several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
His Wikistats project https://stats.wikimedia.org/—with his signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid 2000s https://web.archive.org/web/20060412043240/https://stats.wikimedia.org/—has been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history, driven by curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the communities that most needed it.
Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data describing the growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand some of the growing pains and editor retention issues https://web.archive.org/web/20110608214507/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/12/new-editors-are-joining-english-wikipedia-in-droves/ the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by nearly a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current events like elections https://web.archive.org/web/20160405055621/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2008/09/sarah-palin/ or public health crises https://web.archive.org/web/20090708011216/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/05/h1n1-flu-or-new-flu-or/. He has created countless https://twitter.com/Infodisiac/status/1039244151953543169 visualizations https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/10/27/new-interactive-visualization-wikipedia/ that show the enormous gaps in local language content and representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of pie charts https://web.archive.org/web/20141222073751/http://infodisiac.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/piechartscorrected.png, which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited over 1,000 times https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=stats.wikimedia.org in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators in the same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would be one of the most influential authors in the field, and I don't think it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth and growth of the academic field of Wikimedia research, and more broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement, read his statement http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm to learn what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/ Wired published a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's Massive Data Trove".
Dario
-- *Dario Taraborelli *Director, Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation research.wikimedia.orghttp://research.wikimedia.org • nitens.orghttp://nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Many thanks erik and all the best!! One sentence in eriks blog post cited i found surprising. What type of modesty you guys were talking about?
"At Wikimania London (2014) I talked about how we should err on the side of modesty. That message never came across. I started to have a discussion on this within WMF but failed to bring this to fruition. My bad."
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019, 22:18 Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org wrote:
“[R]ecent revisions of an article can be peeled off to reveal older layers, which are still meaningful for historians. Even graffiti applied by vandals can by its sheer informality convey meaningful information, just like historians learned a lot from graffiti on walls of classic Pompei. Likewise view patterns can tell future historians a lot about what was hot and what wasn’t in our times. Reason why these raw view data are meant to be preserved for a long time.”
Erik Zachte wrote these lines in a blog post < https://web.archive.org/web/20171018194720/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/0...
almost ten years ago, and I cannot find better words to describe the gift he gave us. Erik retired http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm this past Friday, leaving behind an immense legacy. I had the honor to work with him for several years, and I hosted this morning an intimate, tearful celebration of what Erik has represented for the Wikimedia movement.
His Wikistats project https://stats.wikimedia.org/—with his signature pale yellow background we've known and loved since the mid 2000s <https://web.archive.org/web/20060412043240/https://stats.wikimedia.org/
—has
been much more than an "analytics platform". It's been an individual attempt he initiated, and grew over time, to try and comprehend and make sense of the largest open collaboration project in human history, driven by curiosity and by an insatiable desire to serve data to the communities that most needed it.
Through this project, Erik has created a live record of data describing the growth and reach of all Wikimedia communities, across languages and projects, putting multi-lingualism and smaller communities at the very center of his attention. He coined metrics such as "active editors" that defined the benchmark for volunteers, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the academic community to understand some of the growing pains and editor retention issues < https://web.archive.org/web/20110608214507/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/1...
the movement has faced. He created countless reports—that predate by nearly a decade modern visualizations of online attention—to understand what Wikipedia traffic means in the context of current events like elections < https://web.archive.org/web/20160405055621/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2008/0...
or public health crises < https://web.archive.org/web/20090708011216/http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/0...
.
He has created countless https://twitter.com/Infodisiac/status/1039244151953543169 visualizations < https://blog.wikimedia.org/2017/10/27/new-interactive-visualization-wikipedi...
that show the enormous gaps in local language content and representation that, as a movement, we face in our efforts to build an encyclopedia for and about everyone. He has also made extensive use of pie charts < https://web.archive.org/web/20141222073751/http://infodisiac.com/blog/wp-con...
,
which—as friends—we are ready to turn a blind eye towards.
Most importantly, the data Erik has brougth to life has been cited over 1,000 times < https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=stats.wikime...
in the scholarly literature. If we gave credit to open data creators in the same way as we credit authors of scholarly papers, Erik would be one of the most influential authors in the field, and I don't think it is much of a stretch to say that the massive trove of data and metrics Erik has made available had a direct causal role in the birth and growth of the academic field of Wikimedia research, and more broadly, scholarship of online collaboration.
Like I said this morning, Erik -- you have been not only an invaluable colleague and a steward for the movement, but also a very decent human being, and I am grateful we shared some of this journey together.
Please join me in celebrating Erik on his well-deserved retirement, read his statement http://infodisiac.com/back_to_volunteer_mode.htm to learn what he's planning to do next, or check this lovely portrait https://www.wired.com/2013/12/erik-zachte-wikistats/ Wired published a while back about "the Stats Master Making Sense of Wikipedia's Massive Data Trove".
Dario
-- *Dario Taraborelli *Director, Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation research.wikimedia.org • nitens.org • @readermeter http://twitter.com/readermeter _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe