If we can't share it with the public then it seems like it shouldn't be part of a proposal for an API.
On 5 June 2015 at 14:56, Yuri Astrakhan yastrakhan@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yep, the Zero tag would be very useful. Also, something zero team found highly useful are: via (proxy value in x-analytics), https vs http, zero sub domain vs m subdomain.
On Jun 5, 2015 14:51, "Kevin Leduc" kevin@wikimedia.org wrote:
I came across another potential requirement from the WP Zero team: add the x-analytics['zero'] to the dimensions. This would allow the zero team to get pageviews per partner carrier. Our partners are interested in this data, however, they don't want to share it with anyone as it is competitive data, and we can't make it public.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Jon Katz jkatz@wikimedia.org wrote:
Thanks Dan, and apologies if these are naive questions:
For mobile web can we also see beta v. stable? This is important for tracking prototypes, which is one of the core product uses for this data.
For apps can we see ios v android?
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 5 June 2015 at 10:38, Dan Andreescu dandreescu@wikimedia.org wrote:
Gotcha. Reading that proposal it appears to be a proposal for a methodology that will enable future proposals; where are the future proposals?
Well, so the geo cube has to guess a bit at who would find it useful in the future.
It also says "in many countries, disease monitoring must be carried out at the state or metro-area level" - which countries have to be metro-level? Who are we risking the entire reader population for, here? Is it one country, or ten, or?
For what it's worth I love the idea of this kind of live stream. But I want to make sure that how the various chunks are being prioritised, and how critical they are to the outside world, is correlated - and is correlated with the underlying data's sensitivity, at that. If we're introducing risks by going down to city level and the actual use cases for city level data are limited, let's not do that - but this proposal doesn't provide thoughts on how limited those use cases are. It just says that it's required in some countries.
I agree with you, but I'm not sure the data is risky if it's k-anonymous. Most likely, just doing that will limit the countries for which metro level data is available.
I don't think it is if it is! As you said, though, we need to hammer on it for a while to make absolutely sure it's okay, and using lower-resolution data would not only make this easier but also reduce the cost of getting people wrong (geolocating people to MA is less dangerous than geolocating them to Arlington)
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics