It uses 1:1000 random sampling, so I have to count the log events and
multiply by 1000 to get a good estimation. Am I missing something? Quite a bit actually. Mostly that reporting is only available to "some" browsers (the majority but not all) but also only the main document is counted and a pageview is more than the request of the main document. For example, you will not get all 301s/302s or images and there are many, many other details.
See pageview definition: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Page_view
The good source for Recent pageview data is hadoop, going back a bit the well-loved webstatscollector files provide that info: http://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pagecounts-all-sites/
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Gergo Tisza gtisza@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Nuria Ruiz nuria@wikimedia.org wrote:
Back when MediaViewer was launched, I added a namespace parameter to
NavigationTiming to be able to track per-namespace pageviews, Navigation timing is heavily sampled so I am not sure you could estimate pageviews with the scarce dataset it provides, I would say it is not possible.
It uses 1:1000 random sampling, so I have to count the log events and multiply by 1000 to get a good estimation. Am I missing something?
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics