Methodology: 1. take the last 30 days of sampled logs 2. look for IE6 3. count proportionately for (all requests|all text/html requests)
The results: of /both HTTPS and http/ requests, ~0.20% come from IE6; of all text/html requests, 1.3%. I'd note that this is likely to be an /over/estimate; there are some browsers which spoof IE6 that'll be included in these numbers, but would be excluded from e.g. Christian's.[0] On the HTTPS front, Christian's numbers, I trust - checking for HTTPs didn't work for me, since the terminators aren't actually included in the sampled logs.[1] Full results and codebase at https://github.com/Ironholds/POODLE
[0] I knowingly used a crappy ua parsing strategy because it was also a *really fast* ua parsing strategy, and 30 days of logs, even sampled logs, ain't nothing. [1] This doesn't apply to Christian's results; he took the terminator IPs and checked for requests from those ranges. Sensible!
On 15 October 2014 16:50, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
Darnit. Ah well! Okay; finished building the code to retrieve this data. Takes ~400 seconds to handle a day of logs, so take into account parallelisation and I should (should!) have something to show in a couple of hours for the first 3 Qs. The fourth, it seems, is beyond our ken.
On 15 October 2014 15:54, Max Semenik maxsem.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
There's no data for IE6 in EventLogging because IE6 gets no JS these days. Maybe, if there's old enough data...
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
Update: Yuvi's pointed me towards a login attempts schema. All 4 are doable. Data tomorrow morning EST at the latest.
On 15 October 2014 15:19, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
(With "jiffy" read "a day"; even with sampling, big logs are big, and I imagine we probably want ~30 days of data.)
On 15 October 2014 15:18, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
First three are pretty trivial; last one is a bit of a pain, but doable if someone wants to poke me on IRC (/query Ironholds) and chat about what an unambiguous successful login action would look like in terms of requests. But I can do the first three in a jiffy.
On 15 October 2014 13:32, Brandon Black bblack@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
> You invoked my name! > > Emphasis is "logged-in". If you guys want more solid *overall* > numbers, I can get those in short order; this seems like a pretty critical > question to have data on, fast. Lemme know. >
If you can source some good reliable numbers, probably what we care about (all of which have been estimated to some degree in this thread already, I think?) is:
% of all requests from IE6 % of all https requests from IE6 % of all text/html https requests from IE6 (not so important IMHO, if it's difficult) % of all logged-in https requests (or alternatively, % of all successful https login attempts) from IE6.
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation