Sensible! I could. The code is already running, mind, so it would require a restart. But, I'm not seeing why "logged-in" people are a distinct subgroup for the purpose of disabling HTTPS. If we just want "editors", I can get editors, of course.
On 15 October 2014 17:45, Andrew Gray andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
Is there any way you can look at traffic for particular pages? If so, you could look at traffic to something like Special:Watchlist or Special:UserLogin on a representative sample of wikis - anyone using these two pages is very likely to represent a logged-in user, and traffic numbers to them are high enough you might get useful data even with the sampling limits.
Andrew.
On 15 October 2014 21:50, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
Darnit. Ah well! Okay; finished building the code to retrieve this data. Takes ~400 seconds to handle a day of logs, so take into account parallelisation and I should (should!) have something to show in a
couple of
hours for the first 3 Qs. The fourth, it seems, is beyond our ken.
On 15 October 2014 15:54, Max Semenik maxsem.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
There's no data for IE6 in EventLogging because IE6 gets no JS these
days.
Maybe, if there's old enough data...
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
Update: Yuvi's pointed me towards a login attempts schema. All 4 are doable. Data tomorrow morning EST at the latest.
On 15 October 2014 15:19, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
(With "jiffy" read "a day"; even with sampling, big logs are big, and
I
imagine we probably want ~30 days of data.)
On 15 October 2014 15:18, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
First three are pretty trivial; last one is a bit of a pain, but
doable
if someone wants to poke me on IRC (/query Ironholds) and chat about
what an
unambiguous successful login action would look like in terms of
requests.
But I can do the first three in a jiffy.
On 15 October 2014 13:32, Brandon Black bblack@wikimedia.org
wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.org
> wrote: >> >> You invoked my name! >> >> Emphasis is "logged-in". If you guys want more solid overall
numbers,
>> I can get those in short order; this seems like a pretty critical
question
>> to have data on, fast. Lemme know. > > > If you can source some good reliable numbers, probably what we care > about (all of which have been estimated to some degree in this
thread
> already, I think?) is: > > % of all requests from IE6 > % of all https requests from IE6 > % of all text/html https requests from IE6 (not so important IMHO,
if
> it's difficult) > % of all logged-in https requests (or alternatively, % of all > successful https login attempts) from IE6. >
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
--
- Andrew Gray andrew.gray@dunelm.org.uk
Analytics mailing list Analytics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics