Hi Erik,
You're quite right numbers are inflated, and we've been over this before [1]. Below are some sampled data for da.wiktionary from webstatscollector [2] and squid log [3] Bot traffic is a substantial share of 'page views' (but not the majority as you suggest).
We discussed this extensively in April and as I remember (my mail archive is somehow incomplete) decided to implement a second cleaned-up stream without /bot/crawler/spider/http (keeping the original stream so as not break trend lines)
However that bot free stream (projectcounts files with extra set of per wiki totals) never happened yet, and I'm pretty sure we changed plans since, and probably now wait for Kraken. Diederik can you add to this?
Oh my, I thought this was in operation already. I've actually been looking at these page view stats, and now I feel like a fool.
Why not just remove these web pages at http://stats.wikimedia.org/wiktionary/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm since they contain only nonsense? Continuity with old nonsense is still nonsense, so remove everything now and start a new project with real numbers.
[1] On April 8, 2012 you reported a similar issue for Swedish Wikipedia. I checked by then one hour of sampled squid log. 9 out of 13 requests were bots.
Nobody doubts that the Swedish Wikipedia has a substantial amount of human traffic. But for smaller projects, the background noise will dominate. If bots are 9 out of 13 requests to sv.wikipedia (really?), they can easily be 99% of traffic to da.wiktionary.
One easy way to tell would be to observe the daily rhythm. Since Swedish and Danish are limited to one timezone, traffic in the middle of the night should be much smaller than mid-day traffic. But bots could be operating all night, all day. So the least active hour is probably the background noise from bots.