Hi Amir,
Thanks for waiting. As I understand it, we have these options for making the ORES scores visible on article talk pages:
1. A gadget 2. An addition to the ORES extension 3. A bot
Is that correct?
WP:WPP refers to WikiProject Philosophy; did you man something else or am I misunderstanding the abbreviation?
I'm thinking that a gadget might be a workable solution, but my preference would be to have the score displayed on all article talk pages automatically for everyone to see including readers who are not logged in. A bot that posted scores to talk pages and updated the scores on a weekly basis would be good for that purpose.
I'm unclear on how an addition to the ORES extension would work; can you explain further what that option would involve?
Thanks,
Pine
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Amir,
Thanks for getting back to me. My mind is a little full at the moment, and I have some deadlines this week, so it may take me a little while to get back to you. But I'm flagging this conversation for follow up, hopefully by the end of this week or early next week.
Thanks for your patience, Pine
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Amir Ladsgroup ladsgroup@gmail.com wrote:
Hey, ORES has "article quality" models for English, Russian and French Wikipedia. There is a very short introduction in ORES https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Objective_Revision_Evaluation_Service#Article_quality_models description page. But if I want to explain it my way. It'll give you a prediction of class of the article (A, B, C, FA, GA, stub, start) for a given revision. For example for this revision https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alan_Turing&oldid=730400015 ORES predicts https://ores.wikimedia.org/v2/scores/enwiki/?models=wp10&revids=730400015 that it's GA (which it is). The biggest use case for now is that people produce reports of articles needing re https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service/Stories#Updating_WikiProject_Medicine_article_assessments assessment https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service/Stories#Updating_WikiProject_Medicine_article_assessments for wikiprojects https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service/Stories#Updating_WikiProject_Medicine_article_assessments. The other use case is list of popular articles that ORES thinks their quality is low https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DataflowBot/output/Popular_low_quality_articles_(id-2) .
Your use case about ORES prediction is valid the second part is a little bit complicated though. For the first part, we have either option of a gadget or adding it to the ORES extension. If it's very important to let everyone see the scores, we can write a bot to update reports weekly in English Wikipedia for articles in a certain Wikiproject and we use these data in the WPP templates. Which one do you think suits English Wikipedia better?
Best
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:57 AM Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Hi artificial intelligence people,
Are there baseline ORES scores available for articles? If so, I'm thinking that it would be interesting to have the option to add a template to an article's talk page that shows its ORES score as well as its ORES percentile rank on a particular wiki.
Pine _______________________________________________ AI mailing list AI@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai
AI mailing list AI@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai