Hi Amir,

Thanks for waiting. As I understand it, we have these options for making the ORES scores visible on article talk pages:

1. A gadget

2. An addition to the ORES extension

3. A bot

Is that correct?

WP:WPP refers to WikiProject Philosophy; did you man something else or am I misunderstanding the abbreviation?

I'm thinking that a gadget might be a workable solution, but my preference would be to have the score displayed on all article talk pages automatically for everyone to see including readers who are not logged in. A bot that posted scores to talk pages and updated the scores on a weekly basis would be good for that purpose.

I'm unclear on how an addition to the ORES extension would work; can you explain further what that option would involve?

Thanks,

Pine

On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Pine W <wiki.pine@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Amir,

Thanks for getting back to me. My mind is a little full at the moment, and I have some deadlines this week, so it may take me a little while to get back to you. But I'm flagging this conversation for follow up, hopefully by the end of this week or early next week.

Thanks for your patience,
Pine

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Amir Ladsgroup <ladsgroup@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey,
ORES has "article quality" models for English, Russian and French Wikipedia. There is a very short introduction in ORES description page.
But if I want to explain it my way. It'll give you a prediction of class of the article (A, B, C, FA, GA, stub, start) for a given revision. For example for this revision ORES predicts that it's GA (which it is).
The biggest use case for now is that people produce reports of articles needing reassessment for wikiprojects. The other use case is list of popular articles that ORES thinks their quality is low.

Your use case about ORES prediction is valid the second part is a little bit complicated though. For the first part, we have either option of a gadget or adding it to the ORES extension. If it's very important to let everyone see the scores, we can write a bot to update reports weekly in English Wikipedia for articles in a certain Wikiproject and we use these data in the WPP templates. Which one do you think suits English Wikipedia better?

Best

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:57 AM Pine W <wiki.pine@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi artificial intelligence people,

Are there baseline ORES scores available for articles? If so, I'm thinking that it would be interesting to have the option to add a template to an article's talk page that shows its ORES score as well as its ORES percentile rank on a particular wiki.

Pine
_______________________________________________
AI mailing list
AI@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai

_______________________________________________
AI mailing list
AI@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ai