But a usage example demonstrates not just a certain sense of a word, but
also a certain form. That’s why the usage example statement belongs on
the lexeme, not on the sense or form, and links to the relevant sense
and form using demonstrates sense (P6072)
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P6072> and demonstrates form
(P5830) <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P5830>. I’ve taken the
liberty to rearrange the usage example in that format (link
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L37093#L37093$c87964da-4e77-a37b-2bfd-396b4cc3b5d5>,
permalink
<https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Lexeme:L37093&oldid=1312047718#L37093$c87964da-4e77-a37b-2bfd-396b4cc3b5d5>).
Cheers,
Lucas
PS: I confess I don’t understand what this has to do with Abstract
Wikipedia…
On 23.11.20 13:40, Thad Guidry wrote:
Pro:
The P5831 "usage example"
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P5831> has a constraint (as
you can see broken) for only using on the Lexeme main statement, and
my way of loosening that constraint actually coincides with the Lexeme
Data Model even more...where Senses are where we are allowed to place
Synonyms, Translations, etc. to capture the nuances of a Lexeme with
many Senses and not limited to only 1 Sense. Allowing P5831 "usage
example" <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P5831> at a Sense
level to accurately portray the Sense (true meaning). Loosening of
the that constraint will be especially important for generic words
with 10's to 100's of Senses, and then further see similar usages,
even across synonyms. This helps build multilingual knowledge more,
not constrained to less. For example: car (en)
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L3648#2> versus carriage (en-gb)
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L4759#S2>
Con:
None
Thad
https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:49 AM Jan Ainali <ainali.jan(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ainali.jan@gmail.com>> wrote:
Interesting indeed, and also a lovely site, thanks for sharing.
As a side note, I found the use of P5831 novel. I have been taught
to put it as a main statement with the qualifier P6072, but your
way clearly shows that relation anyway. What are the pros and cons
of the two different methods?
Best,
Jan Ainali
http://ainali.com <http://ainali.com>
Den mån 23 nov. 2020 kl 00:45 skrev Thad Guidry
<thadguidry(a)gmail.com <mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com>>:
I just had to share this.
A newly added Lexeme Sense L37093#S5
<https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L37093#S5> by me that
stemmed from applied researchat this URL:
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744478
<https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744478>that was discovered
while playing around with the wonderful Text Visualization
Browser
https://textvis.lnu.se/ <https://textvis.lnu.se/> this
weekendwhen I simply searched on "vector" in hopes of seeing
some results for anything helping with visualizing Vector
Space Models.
Thad
https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
_______________________________________________
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list
Abstract-Wikipedia(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia>
_______________________________________________
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list
Abstract-Wikipedia(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia>
_______________________________________________
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list
Abstract-Wikipedia(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia 