Or "Wiki UK"?
-----Original Message-----
From: wikimediauk-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediauk-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Michael Peel
Sent: 02 October 2008 22:16
To: wikimediauk-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] Name Discussion Thread
Is there a reason why we couldn't go for something simple like
"Wiki" (there was a Wiki Limited, but they're dissoved), or something
like "WikiNet"?
Mike
On 2 Oct 2008, at 22:09, Thomas Dalton wrote:
2008/10/2 Tom Holden <thomas.holden(a)gmail.com>om>:
Someone had some clever acronym based name for us
last month, I can't
remember what it was though. I suggested "WAG" for Wikipedia
Advocacy Group,
but "wag" perhaps has unfortunate connotations these days.
Wiki Information Network (WIN) was the name discussed. Keep
"Wikipedia" out of it, we'll trade under Wikimedia UK once we have a
trademark agreement, but before that we should avoid the trademarks, I
think.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l