[WikiEN-l] iCorrect

[Anthony]

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:05 AM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 March 2011 15:34, Scott MacDonald <doc.wikipedia at ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> E-mail OTRS and you're dealing
>> with a non-editorial non-authority, who might not believe who you are, and
>> probably won't accept your own testimony as other than worthless. Even if
>> you convince the OTRS person, he might well get reverted by someone who
>> can't see the e-mails.
>
> However if OTRS can't it through we are dealing with a situation more
> complex than setting the record strait
>
>> Now, along comes another way of people setting the record straight, and you
>> reject it because a) it doesn't comply with policy b) people may pay $1,000
>> to impersonate someone c) you choose to be cynical about their identity
>> checking d) it doesn't make sense to you.
>
> The kind of people who might normally be expect to spend that kind of
> amount on reputation management have better and cheaper options.

To wit, why not pay $1,000 to get someone else to deal with OTRS for
you?  For $1,000 surely you can hire an expert in the OTRS process to
draft up a letter, have a notary to come to your house, notarize your
signature on the document, and scan it in.