[WikiEN-l] Notability in Wikipedia

[Thomas Dalton]

2009/4/28  <WJhonson at aol.com>:
>
> In a message dated 4/27/2009 4:27:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> thomas.dalton at gmail.com writes:
>
> That's  the point we are disputing, you can't use it as a premise for
> your  argument...>>
>
>
> ----------------------
> I know you are disputing it.  I'm stating that it's a given.
> It underlies our policy that we only consider reliable sources.
> Sources which are not reliable sources, do not count as anything, anywhere
> in the project.
> They don't count to determine notability, they don't count to determine
> extent of coverage, they simply don't count.
>
> That's my opinion of what our policy states.

No-one is disputing what the policy page says. We can all read. The
dispute is over what policy *should* be. Stating what policy *is* is
not at all helpful.