[WikiEN-l] WR's secret forum and list

[Ken Arromdee]

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Matthew Brown wrote:
> > That works only for !!, not for future recurrences of the same situation
> > involving other users.  !!'s innocence was conclusively demonstrated
> > through the posting of an email that embarassed Durova, and which Durova
> > did her best to keep third parties from seeing.
> I recall !! was unblocked significantly before that email was posted -

That's "not convicted", it isn't "conclusively demonstrated the innocence
of".