On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Matthew Brown wrote:
That works
only for !!, not for future recurrences of the same situation
involving other users. !!'s innocence was conclusively demonstrated
through the posting of an email that embarassed Durova, and which Durova
did her best to keep third parties from seeing.
I recall !! was unblocked
significantly before that email was posted -
That's "not convicted", it isn't "conclusively demonstrated the
innocence
of".