[WikiEN-l] status correction

[Fred Bauder]

Your contention was considered by the arbitration committee and  
rejected; both offenders were blocked, if by different people. You  
are in the same position as someone who is caught  and disciplined  
then claims, "No fair, so and so was doing it too and was not  
punished as quickly as I was." You are an administrator and expected  
to more or less follow Wikipedia policies and if you can't or won't  
ought to gracefully accept the consequences.

Geni is to be commended, not "suffer a penalty"!

Fred

On Nov 4, 2005, at 12:14 AM, steve v wrote:

> --- geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I think the somunity made it's feelings pretty clear
>> at the RFC but no matter.
>>
>> You are the second admin to end up on arbcom after
>> pulling a 3RR block I placed on them, In neither
>>
> case > has arbcom had the guts to make a straight
> descission.
>
> Wait a minute. Everybody agrees that the ruling lacked
> decisiveness, but to say the Arbcom lacks "the guts"
> is over the line and nothing short of a personal
> attack.
>
> And since were on the subject, though youre a relative
> newbie, theres no excuse for you to have failed to
> apply 3RR properly, meaning you should have blocked
> CJK too.
>
> What penalty should you suffer for making an improper
> block in the first place? I would prefer to just let
> that go, but my time in the stocks and your own
> "lacking" (of accountability), has soured my
> impression of you.
>
> Stevertigo
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>