[RCom-l] Peer reviewed journal?

[WereSpielChequers]

Would this be a logical thing to have as part of Wikiversity?

Peer review does seem to me very like a Featured article process but with
credentialled reviewers.

WSC

On 22 September 2011 09:53, Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Goran and I were talking yesterday and it reminded me on the need
> which I have from time to time in relation to the Language committee:
> Wikimedia peer reviewed journal. A couple of months ago I thought to
> push it as Language committee issue, but yesterday we've released that
> it's more logical to have it under RCom umbrella.
>
> The journal should publish papers needed by Wikimedia. If we need a
> research or even a review about anything, we could offer to a
> researcher or scientist publishing the paper in our journal (of
> course, if it passes some minimums). Creating infrastructure for peer
> reviewed journal shouldn't be too hard or costly.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> _______________________________________________
> RCom-l mailing list
> RCom-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/rcom-l/attachments/20110922/f05ee6f4/attachment.htm