Would this be a logical thing to have as part of Wikiversity?<br><br>Peer review does seem to me very like a Featured article process but with credentialled reviewers.<br><br>WSC<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 22 September 2011 09:53, Milos Rancic <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:millosh@gmail.com">millosh@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Goran and I were talking yesterday and it reminded me on the need<br>
which I have from time to time in relation to the Language committee:<br>
Wikimedia peer reviewed journal. A couple of months ago I thought to<br>
push it as Language committee issue, but yesterday we've released that<br>
it's more logical to have it under RCom umbrella.<br>
<br>
The journal should publish papers needed by Wikimedia. If we need a<br>
research or even a review about anything, we could offer to a<br>
researcher or scientist publishing the paper in our journal (of<br>
course, if it passes some minimums). Creating infrastructure for peer<br>
reviewed journal shouldn't be too hard or costly.<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
RCom-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org">RCom-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/rcom-l</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>