On 11 May 2012 16:41, Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not 100% sure what's being asked here? Is
this a request to relicense
MediaWiki under GPLv3 instead of v2? Or is this a question of it being
mis-licensed under v3 when we actually specify v2? Clarification is
needed :)
If it's an intact application that's included in the maintenance
directory, does that make it (sufficiently plausibly) part of a mere
aggregation? (that's a question for lawyers)
- d.