Stephen Smoogen has opened a bug about the license in CSS Janus.  This needs wider discussion, though, so I'm copying it here. From https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36747:    I am the maintainer of the mediawiki package for Fedora EPEL    project. While putting together the package for 1.19 it was found    that the license to maintenance/cssjanus is ASL 2.0 and the license    for mediawiki is GPL+2.0. The GPL 2. and ASL 2. are not "compatible"    to the FSF so I am trying to work out my options and to find out    what the mediawiki's projects rationale for bundling the two items    together.    1) cssjanus has a GPL exception to its ASL license that mediawiki knows of.    2) we need to look at mediawiki being used as GPL 3.0 even though it    is not explicitely licensed that way. I'll point the bug to the on-list discussion, so please follow up here. -- Mark A. Hershberger Bugmeister Wikimedia Foundation mah(a)wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Stephen Smoogen has opened a bug about the license in CSS Janus.  This needs wider discussion, though, so I'm copying it here. From https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/36747:    I am the maintainer of the mediawiki package for Fedora EPEL    project. While putting together the package for 1.19 it was found    that the license to maintenance/cssjanus is ASL 2.0 and the license    for mediawiki is GPL+2.0. The GPL 2. and ASL 2. are not "compatible"    to the FSF so I am trying to work out my options and to find out    what the mediawiki's projects rationale for bundling the two items    together.    1) cssjanus has a GPL exception to its ASL license that mediawiki knows of.    2) we need to look at mediawiki being used as GPL 3.0 even though it    is not explicitely licensed that way. I'll point the bug to the on-list discussion, so please follow up here.