I'm wondering:
In Wikisource, we use 3 different namespaces for a book
+ Index: for the Index page |
+ Page: for all the pages. | together, they make the "proofreading"
version of the book.
+ ns:0 for the textual version.
As far as I know, there is no linking between all the pages that make a
book.
There is no "structure" that says "these are 320 Page pages linked to
Index:BOOK.djvu".
Is that maybe something useful, that we want to address via Wikidata?
Or was it the unused BookManager extension that Molly wrote two years ago?
Aubrey
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:51 AM, David Cuenca Tudela <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
It is true that {{Authority control}} does not need
arbitrary item access,
so we can assume that it is already mainstream, although it would be nice
to bring it to all Wikisources
Regarding badges, I agree with Aubrey that we should reuse the current
levels, not only for pages, but also for texts. From the usability point of
view, I don't think that it is a good idea to use percentage numbers as
badge labels, since the numbers are not descriptive, instead I would go for:
- incomplete text
- not proofread
- proofread
- validated
Remember that a page can have more than two badges, so for instance a book
with some missing pages could have been "validated" and be an "incomplete
text". That is probably fine.
Any other comments? Or shall we apply for the wikisource badges already?
Thanks
Micru
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON <
vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2015-06-01 18:35 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk>uk>:
On 1 June 2015 at 16:47, David Cuenca Tudela
<dacuetu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Arbitrary access has been enabled in all
Wikisources, is anybody doing
anything with it that can be replicated in all Wikisources?
{{Authority control}} would be a good use case - we already have
plenty of experience - and reusable code - in multiple Wikipedias.
Happy to advise further if needed.
Does {{Authority control}} use Wikidata arbitrary access ? (I don't think
so… but not sure).
Nonetheless, This template already exists on 8 Wikisources (according to
Wikidata maybe some are missing) and works fine. It should definitively be
use on all Wikisources.
The template Author could maybe benefit from Wikidata arbitrary access
(again not sure, user:Rical works on Modèle:Auteur on fr.ws but I can't
understand his coding)
(by the way, is it normal/a good idea to have this template on
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5615832 mixed with the wikipedia infobox
?)
Cdlt, ~nicolas
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
--
Etiamsi omnes, ego non
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l