We have in German Wikisource the best quality of all Wikisources and
absolutely no problems with IPs. I would like to say "SHUT UP" until
you reach the German standards.
Klaus Graf
2009/10/12 Yann Forget <yann(a)forget-me.net>et>:
Michael Jörgens wrote:
...
And I don't think that ThomasV is willing to
accept any consensus which
is not according to his way of thinking
Have a look at the other ws. Has there been any question of ThomasV what
the consensus in this ws is - or is there
only his dictate!
Have a look here.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20812
While I agree that working with ThomasV is sometimes difficult, he is
right here: allowing IPs to mark pages as proofread defeat the purpose
of the tool. This notation is intended as a certificate by an account
that proofreading is done. Because IP are not constant, the same person
could proofread, and then validate the page. At the very least, IPs
should not be allowed to validate pages. I don't know if this
distinction is possible. And if people are able to proofread articles,
they are certainly also able to login.
Sincerly
Regards,
Yann
--
http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence
http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net
http://fr.wikisource.org/ | Bibliothèque libre
http://wikilivres.info | Documents libres
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l