Hi Sam,
Good idea !
For me, the Wikidata linking part seems (maybe the most) important. That's
a great tools to visualise that most books are badly put in Wikidata (so
much P1957 missing!).
The importing from PG part seems important too (but for fr.ws - IIRC - we
already have most of PG works).
Cdlt, ~nicolas
2016-10-14 12:55 GMT+02:00 Anika Born <WikiAnika(a)wikipedia.de>de>:
Hy Alex,
My comment was not about spending some time on a PG-Projekt or not
spending any time at all.
The point/question (when it comes to de-WS) is a different one:
(A) to spend some of our valuable contributions into a project that
already is freely available (in another format) or spend this time in a
(related) project that is NOT already freely available? (and we do have a
lot of them)
// note, it is not about not spending any time in proofreading or the
Wikisourceproject... it is about finding valuable projects/texts to invest
our time...
I see the thing differently: when a text is on Gutenberg, why should we
redo it again from scratch on Wikisource when we can just copy it?
+ (B) to spend this time in a project, that may cost
us the findability of
the whole wikisource-project (and all other texts on wikisource) because
Google/Bing/others do tag us as fork/reuser/copy of ... (as happened in the
past, at least with de, when we had some texts of the commercial
http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/ that is also supported by ABBY with a free
softwarelizense)
I've never heard of this before. Did it happen only on de.ws ? is it really
because of copying Gutenberg? (and was it before the proofreading which
changed pretty much everything ?)
Cdlt, ~nicolas