2017-11-01 15:44 GMT+01:00 helene78 <newshs(a)numericable.fr>fr>:
The more I read about it-ws Opera namespace, the more
I'm interested in it.
On frws we use "multiple editions" a lot, especially on poems and short
stories, that have been published in different collections. Do you do that
too ?
Also, I had a fantasy, these past weeks, working about "work items" on
wikidata, that we could point on wikisource "work" page, whether we have 1
or multiple editions.
Presently, when, for a poem, we have only 1 edition, we put it in its
collection subpage, and keed the poem title as redirect, then transform it
to "multiple editions" when we get some. This totally prevents to add those
to wikidata, because redirects are not supported ; thus, editions are added
to work items, by adding redirects.
I was wondering whether adding a template similar to "redirect with
possibility" (enwp) could help solve this problem.
Wonder what solution would be best, considering that the creation of a
full-developped "work-page" on a poem could be tricky...
So, what do you think all of you ?
Hélène (frwikisource)
From afar, the Opera: pages on it.ws are very close to
the pages with the
template {{Éditions}} on fr.ws or the template {{Versions}} on
en.ws (and
similar system elsewhere).
The main difference is having a separate namespace A second major
difference is that the templates on fr.ws and en.ws are very light while
the {{Opera}} template took data from Wikidata (but that's an independent
problem, it's possible to change the {{Éditions}} or {{Versions}} templates
to do exactly the same thing without having a specific namespace).
I'm almost convinced too, but in order to create a new namespace on a
project you have to convinced the local community. That's why I'm still
playing the Devil's advocate role and want to learn about the inconvenients
of this system (for instance, since the name of the work is free to use,
does people often use it by mistake?).
Cdlt, ~nicolas