Interesting query, thanks! How odd that "sitcom" is a subclass of
"literary
work"! I never thought of it that way :)
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com
wrote:
> The 500 most important (as in, number of Wiki sitelinks) literary works
> that are (at least partially) in "original language" German, according to
> Wikidata:
>
http://tinyurl.com/mzhd8na
> "The Big Bang Theory" item might need some review, but the rest look
> good...
> Just change the Q188 and the language code for your favourite language!
>
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:58 AM Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> In it.source we made a similar Canon:
>>
https://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Canone_delle_
>> opere_della_letteratura_italiana
>>
>> Ideally, we should have an item (a "work" item, so basically the one
with
>> a Wikipedia article) on Wikidata for each one.
>> Than we can count how many Wikipedias have an article on it. Basically
>> it's Tpt's idea using wikidata and sitelinks.
>>
>> Aubrey
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Jane Darnell <jane023(a)gmail.com
wrote:
>>
>> You can always start with the lists per country (if they exist). So for
>> example I made an article about the first 500 of such a "1000 most
>> important works of literature" list compiled for the Netherlands here:
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_of_Dutch_Literature
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Thomas PT <thomaspt(a)hotmail.fr
wrote:
>>
>> A maybe simpler metric: the top 1000 Wikipedia articles about works per
>> page view.
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> > Le 11 avr. 2017 à 09:42, mathieu stumpf guntz <
>> psychoslave(a)culture-libre.org> a écrit :
>> >
>> > Hi Nemo,
>> >
>> > We may establish a list a the "1000 works that every Wikisource should
>> have" (with translation possibly needed).
>> >
>> > What metric could we use to define such a list? Maybe reference
>> frequency, but it requires statistics whose availability is unknown to me.
>> >
>> > Statistically,
>> > psychoslave
>> >
>> > Le 29/03/2017 à 08:30, Federico Leva (Nemo) a écrit :
>> >> One issue sometimes raised about Wikisource is how we know that
we're
>> working on the "right" books. Internet Archive is planning to
textbooks
>> starting from those which are most frequently assigned in USA schools:
>> >>
http://blog.archive.org/2017/03/29/books-donated-for-
>> macarthur-foundation-100change-challenge-from-bookmooch-users/
>> >>
>> >> I was surprised to learn a project like OpenSyllabus exists and works,
>> I emailed them to ask what it would take to do the same for other
>> languages/geographies.
>> >>
>> >> Nemo
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Wikisource-l mailing list
>> >> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> >>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikisource-l mailing list
>> > Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>> >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikisource-l mailing list
> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
>