So long as Wikimedia isn't advocating a religion, simply presenting phrases
or pictures from religions doesn't seem very objectionable to me unless the
person objecting has some anti-religion motives. Simply saying, "This is
what religion x says/believes/does during December," then there is no harm
done. But the line is drawn when Wikimedia says, "You all must believe X
and worship Y." And that was not done here. Anyone getting in a huff over
it should get over it.
Anyhow, "Sælige Crístesmæsse and sælig níwe géar" in Anglo-Saxon. Sælige
Crístesmæsse everyone!!!!!
James
-----Original Message-----
From: wikipedia-l-bounces(a)Wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Mark Williamson
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:12 PM
To: wikipedia-l(a)wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Religious intolerance
Without commenting on my side on the issue, I think I should note that
paganism is a religion as well, and thus symbols of paganism are
religious symbols. That is however separate from the issue of whether
or not it's OK for us to display religious symbols.
Recently there was a small debate on it.wikipedia about their holiday
logo (there was a poll before it was displayed, but some people
believed that the poll doesn't matter if the logo is against policy)
with objections similar to the ones on fr.wikipedia when they faced a
similar issue. One person said something along the lines of "I find it
ironic that we should display symbols of Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, etc.
holidays when the audience of this Wikipedia itself is so religiously
homogenous" (however, the person who said it was still in favor of
having festive logos for holidays from these faiths anyways). This is
a very good point (besides the fact that their are Muslims, Jews, and
Hindus who speak Italian, and the fact that Italian is spoken as a
second language in Somalia [the people there couldn't read the Somali
Wikipedia instead since it currently has only a couple of articles],
Libya...).
But there is an equally good point: if we celebrated a "Chechnya
independence day" with a logo of that theme, there would be many
objections because it indicates support for a cause. I think that
perhaps there are some comparisons that can be drawn here...
Mark
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 03:42:55 +0100, Jens Ropers <ropers(a)ropersonline.com>
wrote:
I.
Christmas is the holiday previously known as Yule or Yuletide. It was a
northern European seasonal festival since time immemorial. If (and only
if) you consider Yuletide to have been a religious holiday, it was a
NON-Christian religious holiday. But AFAIK Yuletide was a seasonal
festival in the first instance -- only possibly with associated
(non-Christian) religious connotations in the second instance.
II.
Yuletide became known as Christmas thanks to the goody old
three-E-method (of latter-day Microsoft fame): Embrace, Extend,
Extinguish. The Christian church of the day was running a major
conversion effort. They quickly found they couldn't beat old and
cherished traditions such as Yuletide. So they accepted it as a
legitimate festival into the church calendar, they added Christian
symbolism and merged it with Christian ideology (most notably the
holiday was "calculated"/defined to match Jesus of Nazareth's birth),
and finally the entire festival got usurped and monopolized by
Christianity. (Yuletide symbols/traditions such as Christmas trees and
mistletoe still remain. Even Santa Claus is based on a Yuletide figure,
I hear.)
Why am I telling you this?
Well, IMHO "Christmas" is in actuality a quite secular festival. It
''used to be such'' before those Christian missionaries came to
northern Europe and ''it is again today''. Millions if not billions of
non-Christians happily celebrate Christmas all over the world. Which
leads to another point I'd like to make: IMHO "Christmas" (or
"xmas")
has become a GENERIC term and to many, many people all over the world
"Christmas" simply denotes the festival around this time in the year
(which again was previously known as Yuletide), and to many, many
non-Christians it doesn't matter in the least that etymologically
speaking the word "Christmas" carries with it that later added
Christian connotation. For example millions of Japanese
Shinto-Buddhists are quite happy to celebrate Christmas without wanting
to become Christians. I too am quite happy to celebrate Christmas (and
to call it "Christmas"), despite me being a budding polytheist whose
religious beliefs and ethics are decidedly at odds with Christian ones.
And it's not just me to think so: Some French school recently found
itself challenged (in protest) by pupils to remove a Christmas tree as
a supposedly "conspicuous religious symbol". The tree was restored
after it was officially ruled that Christmas trees are pagan symbols:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/05E40EA7-8A8C-486E-BF0E
-8F257310AB5E.htm
IMHO braindead practices of avoiding to say "Merry Christmas"
(spearheaded by corporate America, for fear of some dimwitted
non-Christian suing) actually REINFORCE the mistaken perception of
Christmas as a Christian holiday. ("Happy Holidays." Oh feck off.) I
mean, I'm not trying to be a spoilsport to Christians here. If you're
Christian and you consider Christmas a Christian holiday, well, fine by
me. Just don't expect everybody else to agree.
For the above reasons, I believe any and all concerns over Gerard's
very nice, harmless and well-intended "Merry Christmas and happy New
Year"-project
(
http://it.wiktionary.org/wiki/Buon_Natale_e_felice_Anno_Nuovo%21) are
totally unnecessary and inappropriate. Only someone ignorant of both
the origins of Christmas and the extent to which Christmas is presently
celebrated by followers of the majority of non-Christian religions of
the world could have found fault with Gerard's idea. Thank you Gerard.
:)
Merry Christmas and a happy New Year !!!
:-) :) :-D
-- ropers [[en:User:Ropers]]
www.ropersonline.com
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l