There was an interesting talk on WikiVet at EduWiki.
On 11 October 2012 10:08, WereSpielChequers <werespielchequers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We do have a systematic bias that leads us to
under-represent Africa, and
anywhere else where secondary sources are sparse.
Yes, that is a "systematic bias" effect, and really not our fault (I
mentioned something about this in a workshop on Monday).
But otherwise I believe
the blogger is misinformed.
Or conflating various things. In any case it now seems that enWP may
have turned a corner of sorts last year.
Charles