At 10:14 +0100 2/12/08, Michael Bimmler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Gordon Joly
<gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
I assert that that model is wrong. Maybe not for
inception, but
certainly for the future.
Why?
Being a member of a company (and in future a member of a charity)
will bring a certain responsibility, which some may find is not what
they want.
A company with 1,000 members will be hard to manage. However, a
company with 100 members and 1,000 friends will be much easier to
keep running.
I believe most people would want to be a "friend" rather than a
"member", and I mean "member" in the technical sense of
"guarantor
member".
Gordo
--
"Think Feynman"/////////
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
gordon.joly(a)pobox.com///