2008/7/7 Tom Holden <thomas.holden(a)gmail.com>om>:
OK well I'm not going to fight too much for Oxford
if I'm the only one who
thinks London isn't that great an idea, but before I shut up I'll just make
a few points:
· Wikimania has been in cities other than the capital or largest one
more often than not (Frankfurt not Berlin, Cambridge not DC or NY,
Alexandria not Cairo).
· We have tried London before. Many times. Even with very active bid
leaders (Alison, Gary) we had no luck.
· London is spread out over a massive area. This either means
significant journeys from accommodation to conferences to restaurants, or
doing basically everything in one of the university's campuses, making us
very dependent on that university for everything and giving a rather
claustrophobic feel.
· London is expensive and is globally perceived as being even more
expensive than it actually is. Being firmly rooted in a university campus
would ameliorate this, but it's always going to be an issue when it comes to
evaluating bids.
· The transport advantages are illusionary. Getting into the centre
of London from Heathrow does not take significantly more time than getting
into the centre of Oxford (there are shuttle busses). (Oxford is of course
not unique in this: Reading, Guildford, Cambridge etc. all have similar
services I'd imagine).
The strongest arguments for Oxford in particular are:
· The presence of the Oxford Internet Institute. A ready source of
speakers and a unique selling point (would be particularly useful in
ensuring serious press coverage).
· Oxford's popularity as a tourist destination.
· Its compact city-centre.
· Fairly high tech population. 3 games companies off the top of my
head, major web design companies. Regular "geek nights" meetings.
Do we have any contacts in UCL/LSE/Imperial anymore? If not then my contacts
in Oxford university would be another advantage.
I tend to agree that going for London straight away, without due
consideration, is not necessarily the most sensible option.
Tom makes excellent points in favour of Oxford (that don't apply to a
city such as Manchester). The transport question is not crucial if
the city chosen is near to London, as none of the airports are in the
city centre.
The obvious alternatives, therefore, would be Oxford, Reading and
Cambridge. Oxford and Cambridge have the attraction of the historic
universities in a way London does not (the Library of Alexandria
factor).
Cambridge obviously is the centre of a technology region and has two
universities' facilities. It has excellent transport links (to London
and to the airports). A huge proportion of Cambridge's residents work
in central London (the train is less than 45 minutes to King's Cross).
I say this not necessarily in support of Cambridge, Oxford or anywhere
else, or even in opposition to London, but in support of asking the
questions before making this decision.
--
Sam
PGP public key:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sam_Korn/public_key