Hi Andreas,
There is no denial that money is needed in our region to run programs but
there should always be a critical debate, if we are asking too much amount
and for the right cause. I can't talk about others but I come from a
cross-border language community which has always shown high regards to the
value of donation money and expressed concerns in the past, whenever it has
felt that money asked in a grant proposal is out of proportionate. So,
whenever a grant proposal comes from my language community or from the two
affiliates of the region, we brainstorm for days, if not months, to
understand if there remains any small chance to waste the valuable
resources which are to be entrusted upon us. For example, questions
naturally arises in our community that if we really need to or have the
luxury to spend this huge amount of around 10 million INR just for a 3-days
conference to meet and greet each other after a long time or could that
amount of money be invested on local affiliates and communities so that
they can sustain themselves and provide quality output for the next decade.
There has always been this debate and the people who talked about the
second option are quietly moving away from the movement as they were not
heard properly or were targeted for their critical analysis. We strongly
feel that throwing unnecessary amount of money to whatever proposal comes
over from the region is detrimental to the community dynamics as these
money spoils people in the communities, brings more mistrusts and
corruption and changes the motivation to contribute to the open knowledge
movement. Also, huge amount of money does not necessarily translate to
delivery of high quality output all the time, good results can come from
limited resources too, even with zero budget, if they are planned properly;
there are numerous success stories in our movement of those, which are
rarely acknowledged or celebrated.
What we feel that there might be some 'white guilt' working in the
background to reverse colonial sins from the past in the regions which
might drive people from the west to approve more money in Africa and Asia
without consideration of local inputs. Any voices against these western
perspectives to flood local communities with huge amount of unnecessary
money are marked as counter-productive, ignored, silenced and bypassed with
different regulatory measures imposed upon the community until people stop
criticising and get fed up of being ignored. For example, personally, I
have developed apathy nowadays regarding whatever is happening around grant
process western to our state border of West Bengal until they directly
affects us and prefer to remain silent during their community review
process.
By the way, I have no objection hiring WMF staffs from the region. In fact,
a number of staffs and contractors from the region are and were highly
respected for their support and understanding of the local communities. But
all are not beds of roses. There are multiple evidences of opacities,
ignorance, agenda pushing, bossing around, corporate mentality, hijacking
of community plans and projects etc. among staffs, which builds walls of
mistrusts separating them with the volunteers rather than breaking them. I
can't disagree to what Jayantilal implied in his statement. So, to me,
staffs are always welcome, but if they have no intention to listen and
support for community needs, then we frankly don't need them around our
communities to push their own agenda, we can manage ourselves.
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
On Thu, May 4, 2023, 18:30 Andreas Kolbe <jayen466(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Bodhisattwa and all,
You raise an interesting point – that the influx of money appears to have
a demotivating effect on Indian volunteers. This has also come up in
discussion elsewhere.
Now I have been one of those who have urged the WMF to spend more money in
India. I have always felt that actual spending on the ground has not
matched the Foundation's fundraising messages about how money is urgently
needed to build capacity in Indian and African languages. And I have argued
that hiring staff in India, e.g., makes more sense than hiring staff in the
US, where salary expectations may run to hundreds of thousands of dollars
per year.
How would you resolve these competing considerations?
Regards,
Andreas (Jayen466)
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 3:21 AM Bodhisattwa <bodhisattwa.rgkmc(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
Coincidentally, just yesterday afternoon, when we were having a meeting
in Kolkata with volunteers from West Bengal and Bangladesh, these concerns
came up among other things. We were wondering about the visible impact of
the increasing number of WMF staffs in India to improve our editing and
reading experiences, significant partnership development or strengthening
the communities in the last few years and if they have any impact at all in
our language community to make our life easier as volunteers.
Anyway, if the volunteer communities or team of organizers are not strong
and vigilant enough, there is always a chance to get something hijacked by
staffs. This is not new; it has happened before a number of times and it
will happen a lot more in the future. This could not be avoided as I feel
the spirit of volunteerism in the Indian communities is much much weaker
than the past and dying, if not already dead in some of the cases. In the
last few years, I have seen long term trusted community members from all
over the country leave the movement frustrated, heart broken and exhausted,
including from my language community. Increasing flow of unnecessary money
are rapidly changing the motivation of volunteers with a strange notion
prevailing nowadays that money is the solution of all problems in the
region. Community oversight and long discussions on meta talk pages about
any huge amount of grant proposals are now a thing of the past. But who
cares?
Unlike the previous wiki conferences, the wider Indian community did not
get the invitation and space to actively take part in the decision making
process from the very start of planning this conference which led to giving
room to WMF staffs, who took over. Without community vigilance, a 3 days
conference asked and spent 3 times more donation money than the last one
and has set up precedences of many unwanted things which would burden
future community programs and events in India. It's not at all surprising
that even though no one was stopped, but a very few number of volunteers
from my language community actually applied and participated in the
conference, even being one of the most active community in the region.
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
On Thu, May 4, 2023, 00:53 Subhashish <psubhashish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I find this email better worded than the other
one in this list a few
days back which was also about different issues.
Some of these issues, though I'm not personally aware of, certainly need
to be addressed by WMF.
Thank you for upholding the importance of the community by saying -- "I
am okay with WMF staff being paid, but it should not undermine unpaid
volunteers and the movement's ethos." Can't agree more.
While I see public listing of WMF staff and contractors both on-wiki [1]
and the Foundation's official site, WMF staff in India might mean staff and
contractors who are hired both for long-term and short-term and part-time
roles. It could also mean those who play global roles (say, engineering
staffers) but reside in India and don't necessarily interface only with the
India-based community. Their participation in a national level event could
be an one-off thing.
But those nuances apart, the volunteer and staff dynamics certainly is a
topic worth discussing.
A worse social phenomenon in India is a foreigner being treated with
more dignity than a local. The intersectionality of caste, gender, fluency
in English, intergenerational privilege and many other social factors play
a role. I still think this is not a standalone issue and should be
discussed (and investigated if needed) keeping in mind the
intersectionality.
1.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikimedia_Foundation_staff
Subha
On Wed, May 3, 2023, 11:09 PM Jayantilal Kothari <
jayantilalkkd(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Maryana Iskander and Wikimedia Foundation,
I hope this email finds you well. I am writing to request more
transparency about the roles and responsibilities of WMF staff in India. I
am assuming good faith and believe that any issues arising are
unintentional; however, these occurrences seem to be negatively impacting
the overall movement.
It has come to my attention that WMF allocates a relatively small
amount of funds to the Indian community. This implies that a significant
portion of donor money is spent on staff, making it crucial to ensure that
donors and the Wiki community are aware of how the funds are being utilized
and the impact generated.
Firstly, I have noticed that WMF hires non-community staff members who
may be initially unfamiliar with the Wikimedia community and movement in
general. This is not an issue as long as newly recruited staff members are
willing to work collaboratively with the community, rather than competing
with them. Unfortunately, there have been instances where this has not been
the case, such as WMF India staff paying Instagram users without consulting
the community, and the recent WikiConference India, where WMF staff
overshadowed volunteer committees and took over volunteer roles during
conference planning.
Initially, I thought that privacy concerns might be the reason behind
the lack of transparency. However, during the recent conference, I observed
that such staff members were comfortable being on stage and being
identified as WMF Staff amongst friends from the industry whom they invited
to the conference. It appears that more people from the industry are aware
of WMF India staff's existence than the community itself. Some staff
members were keen to take credit for the entire movement and even
conference planning in front of the volunteer community and friends from
the industry. It might help and advance the careers of WMF India staff by
showcasing WikiConference India on their resumes, but the main purpose of
such community events is to give a chance to community leadership and to
celebrate unpaid community members. I am okay with WMF staff being paid,
but it should not undermine unpaid volunteers and the movement's ethos.
The Wiki community looks up to WMF staff for support, but now there is
a fear that WMF staff may hijack community programs and stages, with
WikiConference India being a recent example.
There seems to be a lot of mystery surrounding the roles and
responsibilities of WMF India staff members and their interactions with
volunteer communities. The Wiki community is dedicated to the mission and
will continue to thrive even without WMF staff. I believe it is crucial for
WMF to publicly share the roles, responsibilities, and outcomes of the WMF
India staff over the last few years. This transparency will enable
community members and donors to appreciate the efforts of WMF India staff,
as currently, the impact of their work remains unknown.
I kindly request that WMF provides a list of all WMF India staff
members and their achievements, so we can celebrate their accomplishments
and collaborate with them more effectively.
Looking forward to your response.
With Regards,
Jayantilal
--
Regards,
Jayantilal
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list -- wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimediaindia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikimediaindia-l.lists.wikimedi…
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list -- wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimediaindia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikimediaindia-l.lists.wikimedi…
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list -- wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
wikimediaindia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikimediaindia-l.lists.wikimedi…
_______________________________________________
Wikimediaindia-l mailing list -- wikimediaindia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimediaindia-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from the list / change mailing preferences visit
https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikimediaindia-l.lists.wikimedi…