On 14 February 2013 19:31, Theo10011 <de10011(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If you read again, I questioned, denoted by a question
mark - if achal
*still* serves on their board and if there was still an association. I asked
still, because I knew he did at one point and I don't follow either of them.
Which is why I said "Your caveats notwithstanding."
What assertions? He *did* serve on their board, he
just quit some time ago.
I don't follow achal or CIS's internal structure.
"As far as I know achal still serves on your board?" or "Does Achal
still serve on your board?". Weasel wording will take you places.
You are getting awfully defensive here for achal, for
asking a direct
question if Achal was still on their board or not.
Oooh! Look! A red herring!