Sure..except we weren't asking contributors to use this feedback to fix up
the articles. I do know that even without any standing system to improve
it, several article improvements were made. All I can give you
quantifiably, though, is that editors saw the feedback, and thought a big
chunk of it was "stuff I can use".
On 9 February 2012 04:44, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Oliver Keyes
<okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
We'll experiment with wordings as the testing
progresses. On your other
point - again, how can we find this out without testing it? If little is
done with it, we can look into junking it, but nothing ventured...
you say that you have existing feedback, and contributors have seen
this feedback.
You *can* already determine whether that feedback (already in hand)
resulted in article improvements.
--
John Vandenberg
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation