On the first one, no idea - if you have any idea how we can test this
without full deployment, please, go ahead. On the second, it should scale;
we're using a randomised sample (minus DAB pages)
On 9 February 2012 04:17, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Oliver Keyes
<okeyes(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Minata: I imagine the plan is "deploy on
enwiki, and if other wikis ask
for
it, they can have it too", but I'll find
out :).
In reply to "It allows readers to provide feedback; that feedback is not
likely to
result in improvements except in rare cases" - actually, no. We ran
several
rounds of hand-coding, and between 35-70 percent
(rounding; it depends on
which form you use, and which criteria) of feedback is deemed useful by
editors. This could be praise for the article, suggestions for new
things,
or notes of errors with existing content.
And what percentage of the feedback resulted in article improvements?
And will that scale when feedback is being left about all articles?
Even useful notes left on the talk page are unlikely to result in
article improvements within a reasonable timeframe.
--
John Vandenberg
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
--
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation