Thanks for the quick reply, Hans! If our representatives would (for
example) translate an English company page into Norwegian, and then
explain the edits on the talk page, and identify their conflict of
interest on their user pages and also the article talk page, would you
expect that that would be seen as fair and transparent by the
Norwegian Wikipedia community?
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Hans A. Rosbach
<hans.a.rosbach(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In no-wp we have a policy that usernames shall be for
individuals and thus
typical company usernames are blocked and asked to request change of names.
These users then have no restrictions on which pages to edit. As long as we
don't demand identification of users, restrictions on edits would IMO be
futile anyway.
Hans A. Rosbach / User:Haros
On 21 October 2013 15:14, David Richfield <davidrichfield(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
When I'm not editing Wikimedia projects, I work for Mondelez
International, and our Social Media team has contacted me for advice
on responsible engagement with Wikipedia. I know that different
language projects have different rules on whether company
representatives should:
* Edit pages directly or only ever edit talk pages
* Edit under their own names or under company names
What are the rules for the Nordic languages?
Thanks,
David
--
David Richfield
[[:en:User:Slashme]]
+491723724440
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
David Richfield
[[:en:User:Slashme]]
+491723724440