"Cool Cat" wrote
The wiki way is consensus. Being bold is fine. Anyone
can boldly suggests a
new categorization scheme.
There needs to be a way to regulate bold decisions that affects tens to
hundreds of articles. If you have a better suggestion feel free to suggest
it.
There doesn't 'need to be' that. I have gone into mathematics categories with
a couple of hundred articles and subdivided them on the fly. This has improved the
encyclopedia, and if I had had to await some sort of approval (from whom?) I would not
have bothered.
The wiki way is certainly not bound by pre-arranged consensus; much more characteristic of
good Wikipedians is how they react to those who find fault with what they do (namely, to
take it well).
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam