-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Kirk [mailto:gary.kirk@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 01:25 PM
To: 'English Wikipedia'
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] "Wicked-pedia" in today's Daily Mail
So really, why write a story about it in <s>newspaper</s> the Daily
Mail? A friend vandalises my userpage. Do I use this as a stage to
attack him? No. I move on.
And Jerry Sanger, I ask you... ;-)
On 23/04/07, Tony Sidaway <tonysidaway(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Mak <makwik(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here's the url
>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id…
> >
>
> Quite a well written, amusing little piece, not at all the hack job
> I'd been led to expect. Petronella Wyatt was apparently vandalised by
> the insertion of all kinds of lurid allegations. She complained and
> apparently it was fixed. She thinks she knows who did it.
What caused this is writing an article about someone who is not notable enough that the
article would be read or watched. If it were not autobiographical, at least the creator of
the article might have it on their watchlist. But as it is, who knew or cared? Our process
depends on articles getting enough attention that errors are noticed.
Fred