On 4/23/07, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote: I agree with you, pointing out what I think you acknowledged but wasn't made clear. She created this article on herself. Someone else came along and vandalized it. Maybe it was someone else, anyway. I don't think we can rule out the possibility that she did it herself to create a news story. It's sad that this stuff lasted so long. We desperately need a more organized system for policing articles, especially ones about living people. But I don't think Wikipedia or the foundation is to blame for any of this. We have enough eyes to catch this sort of thing much faster. Can we please have some effort put into designing a system to utilize those eyes efficiently? I'm not really talking about stable versions - a simple system to list the "least examined edits" would be enough. Defining which users count as valid "examiners" would be the hardest part of the implementation, but *any* half-assed definition of who qualifies would improve the system drastically. C'mon, this could be implemented in a couple weeks by a single person working a few hours a day. I'm forwarding this to foundation-l. Anthony