AFD itself is quite broken. Decisions made at AFD may
not necessarily represent the best interest of the site. The use of DRV had
skyrocketed over the passing years. Originally there was no need for a DRV.
- White Cat
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:28 AM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/1/14 Carcharoth
<carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com>om>:
"cleanup" is not an AfD result I've
ever seen. It has been a
long-standing axiom as far as I can remember that AfD is not cleanup.
What *can* happen is someone closes as keep or no consensus, and then
*adds* their opinion (or that of others) that cleanup is needed. But
that is not a close of "cleanup".
This does not square with practice, where people will aggressively
defend whatever the AFD comes out as. "But the AFD consensus was to
GUT THAT LIST!"
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l