Hoi,
Lets take things slowly. It is vital that we get Wikipedia well connected
first. Plenty of challenges there. If we concentrate on what Wikipedia
needs in all its languages, we will get a perspective of what is notable
for us. Other sources have their criteria..
Thanks,
GerardM
On 5 March 2016 at 19:56, Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
On 5 March 2016 at 16:15, Markus Krötzsch
<markus(a)semantic-mediawiki.org>
wrote:
I agree with Egon that the uniqueness requirement
is rather weird. What
it
means is that a thing is only considered an
"identifier" if it points to
a
database that uses a similar granularity for
modelling the world as
Wikidata. If the external database is more fine-grained than Wikidata
(several ids for one item), then it is not a valid "identifier",
according
to the uniqueness idea.
Then we should create a Wikidata item for each concept on that
external database.
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata