Pine,
NEWT is an acronym that has already been used on Wikipedia, and judging from multiple
references in this week's RFB, while that project was suspended several years ago the
acronym is not forgotten.
Jargon is confusing and a barrier to onboarding newbies at the best of times, but jargon
that requires a disambiguation page is probably worse.
Jonathan
On 27 Jul 2017, at 00:09, Pine W
<wiki.pine(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Kerry,
Thanks for the comments. I hope that Leila will respond. I have a few
thoughts:
1. Have you tried the New WikiText Editor (NWTE, which I want to call NEWT
so that it's easily pronounceable), particularly on talk pages? I think
that new users will find it to be considerably easier to use than "pure"
wikimarkup.
2. I agree with the sentiment about VE on talk pages. Perhaps you could ask
the WMF folks if there has been further thought about enabling VE on talk
pages. The last time that I asked the answer was "no" and the evolutionary
paths for talk pages are planned to be NWTE/NEWT and Flow.
3. I agree that more mentoring of newbies would be good, but there is
finite human resource capacity among the more experienced editors and those
editors already have plenty of work. The Wiki Ed Foundation and other
organizations are increasingly providing paid staff time to mentor
Wikimedians, and I think that this is a more realistic option than
lecturing the existing volunteer community that we should be doing yet more
work for free. WMF has plenty of money and it seems to me that spending
some of that money on training and mentoring programs is probably
worthwhile.
Pine
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l