Hi James,
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 8:04 AM, James Salsman <jsalsman(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is anyone studying the rate at which external links become unavailable
on Wikipedia projects?
I just did a quick tally and less than 40% of the external links cited
in the introductions of L1-vital enwiki health and social science
articles I sampled were good, and that's only counting those which
didn't already have a {{dead link}} tag.
I thought that the bots were doing a better job of replacing dead
links with archive copies than they apparently are.
Two items to share:
* In FY17-18 Annual Plan, Program 11 [1]: Objective 1, Outcome 1 is
closely related to your question/observation. I expect more research
in this space as a result.
* InternetArchiveBot [2] is one bot that I know operates in this
space. If you are interested in it, it would be good to have a
discussion with the team behind that bot to learn how the bot
currently operates and what it needs to be improved.
Best,
Leila
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2017-2018/…
[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:InternetArchiveBot
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l