Also, you can ask in the village pumps in PL and RU. You will get replies
from the recent changes patrollers.
2010/8/20 Felipe Ortega <glimmer_phoenix(a)yahoo.es>
--- El *vie, 20/8/10, emijrp <emijrp(a)gmail.com>*
escribió:
De: emijrp <emijrp(a)gmail.com>
Asunto: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Polish and Russian vandalism revert tags
Para: "Research into Wikimedia content and communities" <
wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Fecha: viernes, 20 de agosto, 2010 18:22
Hi;
2010/8/20 Felipe Ortega
<glimmer_phoenix@yahoo.es<http://mc/compose?to=glimmer_phoenix@yahoo.es>
That's also why we are not currently using the MD5 hash approach (we do
need to differentiate among different types of reverts, not only detect
them).
But you can use MD5 to identify *all* the reverts, and then classify them
with their comments.
Sure, and I think MD5 is a pretty efficient way of identify reverts. The
point is that, once we start looking at comments, it's better to go ahead
with them, since in theory we don't need to check against MD5 if we missed
some revert.
However, we will have to compare MD5 and comments procedures. Comments are
considered a fairly conservative approach, though a good proxy, and that's
why we selected them.
F.
Regards,
emijrp
-----Adjunto en línea a continuación-----
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org<http://mc/compose?to=Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l