Thanks for your reply, Kerry. I meant any kind of quality improvement.
Some mechanisms may target specific type of editors, and others might be quite general.
Best,
Haifeng Zhang
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Human-Computer Interaction Institute
Carnegie Mellon University
________________________________
From: Wiki-research-l <wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of
Kerry Raymond <kerry.raymond(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:16:12 PM
To: 'Research into Wikimedia content and communities'
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Ways thru which articles could attract editors
"Article quality" is quite a wide topic. I would imagine most good faith
contributors believe they are improving the quality of an article with every edit. Do you
have some specific type of quality improvement in mind? E.g. more citations, more content,
fewer spelling errors?
Kerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Wiki-research-l [mailto:wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of
Haifeng Zhang
Sent: Sunday, 28 April 2019 7:53 AM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
<wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Ways thru which articles could attract editors
Dear folks,
I wonder what are those mechanisms/events (in Wikipedia or WikiProjects) which may attract
editors to improve article quality.
One example is Today's articles for improvement. Within WikipProjects, GA/FA
nominations seem useful too.
Thanks,
Haifeng Zhang
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l