If you are pushing for an MMP, it would be best not to use my code. It's shoddy,
poorly written, broken, and inefficient. Frankly, I'm amazed it lasted as long as it
did.
-X!
On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Paul Selitskas <p.selitskas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Merlijn van Deen
<valhallasw(a)arctus.nl> wrote:
On 12 March 2012 15:49, Hydriz Wikipedia
<admin(a)alphacorp.tk> wrote:
Tparis has the full source code of those tools, and looks like he has
already brought them up on his own account. See
https://toolserver.org/~tparis.
Could we (in general) *please* not do this? If someones tools are important
enough to be taken over by someone else, they are most certainly important
enough for a multi-maintainer project. In {one month, one year, five years},
Tparis' account will also expire and we will have the same problem all over
again.
Best,
Merlijn
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
That's a good point not to do this ever more. But then we are about to
return to the stable toolserver approach, aren't we? :) By the way
there is a sort of bugs in Soxred's tools concerning language code <->
project subdomain conversion which I would like to fix or at least
report them (I can remind that I've already done it once in Soxred's
googlecode issue tracker).
--
З павагай,
Павел Селіцкас/Paul Selitskas
Wizardist @ Wikimedia projects
p.selitskas(a)gmail.com, +375257408304
Skype: p.selitskas
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette